themillennialkingdom.org.uk - A Book Review and Letter

A Book Review

Themillennialkingdom.org.uk Spined HTML

ATypesettingReview A BOOK REVIEW AND LETTER   [The pursuit writings are presented as a tribute to a dear friend and brother in Christ - now gone to be with his Lord.  I have had the privilege of meerting Jack Green and his wife Christine at their home and having several telephone conversations with them over the years.   Jack knew G. H. Lang’s daughter Mary, and was instrumental in helping Lewis Schoettle to republishing most her father’s writings.   I am informed that the pursuit ‘Book Review,’ was one of several which he produced for ‘Watching and Waiting’.   The ‘Letter to a brother in Christ’ he gave to me with several others, which were not to be disclosed for public reading.  The pursuit one had his permission to be used on ‘the website’. -  Ed.]     -------     1   ATypesettingReview     By. JACK A. GREEN.     A Story of Conflict: The Controversial Relationship Between Benjamin Wills Newton & John Nelson Darby, by Jonathan D Burnham, published by Paternoster Press, P 0 Box 1047, Waynesboro, Georgia, 30830-2047, U.S.A. Moreoverobtainable from Authentic Media, P 0 Box 300, Carlisle, Cumbria, CA3 OQS, Price £19.99.     -------     Since W. Blair Neatby’s ‘History of the Plymouth Brethren’ (1901) there have been several studies of the movement’s beginnings and, recently, a number of biographies of Darby: this fresh publication is one of the few attempts to requite full sustentation to B. W. Newton as well.  Newton tapped with Brethren in 1847 surpassing their first unconfined division.  Hence, as he was never eitherUnshutor Exclusive, he is usually dealt with in brief.  Hitherto we have been indebted to Mr G. H. Fromow’s ‘Teachers of The Faith and The Future’ for in-depth information on Newton, his life and theology, but Dr. Burnham has washed-up much to redress the balance.  He uses all possible sources in a masterly malleate to place within small compass the Christology, understanding of Ministry, Church Order and Prophetic Truth set along by, what was then, the infant movement.     The details regarding J. N. Darby are so well documented, we here concentrate upon what will be of most interest to readers of ‘Watching and Waiting’: The early life, the illustrious wonk career of Newton in Oxford; his spiritual quickening at University; his emergence from the political and social upheaval of the days of his youth to take his place among many other eminent persons in the spiritual risorgimento at Oxford in the early 19th Century; his secession from the Established Church and his rise to wilt the leading Elder and Teacher in the largest Brethren Assembly in England - all this and increasingly is unfolded in interesting and detailed fashion.  In addition, we are furnished with many interesting facts regarding Mr Newton’s public and private life between his leaving Brethren in 1847 and his death in 1899, at the wide age of 91.     We are pleased to see the impartial and soft-hued manner in which the tragedian deals with the charges of Christological Heterodoxy and outright wade on Newton’s personal weft without the views of Darby and Newton became irreconcilable.  The latter tuition was supposed quite unfounded by a soul of self-sustaining brethren who investigated them, as Burnham fully shows: as to the former tuition we refer our readers to Mr Fromow’s typesetting ‘Teachers of the Faith and The Future,’ Chapter 28 – ‘A Statement and Acknowledgement and aUnobtrusiveLetter,’ expressly the words of G. H. Lang therein quoted.  Commenting on Newton’s ‘Confession’ he said:-     “If it he asked why so thorough a confession and withdrawal did not end the controversy, the wordplay must be that Mr. Newton’s opponents had ceased to walk in love, and therefore worldly influences, such as bitterness, ambition, a party spirit, overcame them.  A solemn warning to us today.  It is to he remembered that this unobtrusive document was the work of a distinguished scholar and theologian, a Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford.  It shows how the grace of God can preserve from pride, by enabling one to humiliate himself publicly over public failure.  A very needed and yet encouraging lesson for us today.  Mr. Newton’s failure shows that scholarship of the highest order does not render a teacher infallible.  Hence, we should not slavishly follow any man, however eminent or godly.  This applies as fully te J. N.  Darby tween Mr. Newton’s other opponents as to himself.  While ready to learn from all, and thankful for all true knowledge, we must follow the Lord and His Word only.  But still increasingly emphatically do these remarks wield to not pursuit men uneducated and untrained in the difficult problems of theology, for such are still increasingly likely to miss the way.  We must not worship education, and much less ignorance.  Brethren to-day should remember that the group of men whom God chose that He might embark by them this powerful spiritual movement worked a sunny galaxy of classical and theological talent and acquirement.”   - (G. H.  Lang’s  ‘Departure,’ page 112).     It is of unconfined importance to note relative to this whole controversy that the original misstatement by Mr Newton was as to RELATIONS in which the Lord Jesus stood.  NOT HIS PERSON.  His stuff God and Man in One Person, His all holiness and sinless sacrifice were never for one moment in question. Nothing would well-spoken up this controversy quicker than to perceive the difference (see Tregelles ‘Threc Letters…’ page 24).     Readers of ‘Watching and Waiting’ will he pleased to pass on from those ugly incidents which marred so the early history of the Brethren to see the views of B. W.  Newton on Ministry, Church Order, Prophetic and Dispensational Truth and God’s Plans for Israel and the Church faithfully reproduced.     Everyone who reads this typesetting will not stipulate with every conclusion, of course. We have doubts well-nigh the underlying reasons given for the mismatch at Plymouth in the 1840’s (see page 204): it is our own wits of stormy opposition and misrepresentation from those holding Darby’s views, no matter how Scripturally and lovingly opposed, the intoxication of hero worship of unconfined teachers and the self-satisfaction this brings which causes us to stipulate with the words. of the unconfined and good Dr Tregelles:-     “You towards to be so perfectly enlightened that the opposition to Mr Newton arose entirely from his prophetic views stuff disliked by Mr Darby, that I need not insist on the point.  Out of this sprang all the charges versus Mr. Newton, and the endeavour to condemn him on every possible ground.  Had he accorded with Mr Darby on Prophecy, we should never have heard his voice raised versus him as to Ministry or Church Order; his writings would not then have been scrutinised with severity, in order to glean matter of accusation.  I might ask whether the writings of his opponents would stand such an ordeal?”   - (Tregelles ‘Three Letlers...’ page 71).     It was thus from the very time these new views were first urged.  The reviewer would pose this question: why is it that this School has been, and is, so intolerant?  This is a unstipulated statement which holds good despite many gracious exceptions.  Could it be that there is a fear that to welsh their ‘ex-cathedra’ position would end in debate with an unshut Bible, with word-for-word exegesis sweeping the theory away?     This work deserves wide recognition and with the slight reservations mentioned we heartily commend it to readers of ‘Watching and Waiting,’ and prophetic students of all schools.  One good result this fine study could bring about, would be that without 150 years of requirement and counter requirement Bible students read what Newton unquestionably wrote on any given subject.  It would be weightier if those interested in the Prophetic Word were to wilt ‘noble Bereans’ who, with all readiness of mind daily search the Scriptures whether these things are so (Acts 17: 11).     *       *       *     2     A LETTER FROM JACK A GREEN TO A ‘BROTHER’ IN CHRIST.       Dear Brother     Thank you for your letter of 30th of Oct.  I found the contents quite a surprise!  How everyone from outside Brethren could have produced so masterly a work, with so much well-judged detail is quite wondrous to me - and I spent many years in the so tabbed ‘Open Brethren’!!   I too was Church of England once: I left that Church, in which I was brought up, in 1956, the year without my conversion.  Alas, it has slipped so badly; it seems to me so rapidly in recent years.  There are grave moral issues, it is very clear, confronting the members, not merely theological ones.   I write, however, in the knowledge that none of us is well-spoken of the unfaithful vein of modem Christendom. We all have situations which trouble us: it ill becomes one to be ‘holier than thou’.  It is so good to read of your firm convictions regarding the foundations of the faith and of your loyalty to Christ, the incarnate Son of God.  Most refreshing.   I no longer meet with Brethren, that is to say, of the Plymouth type.  It took many years for the ‘penny to drop’ vis-a-vis their teachings, which are too far fetched to be real.  Indeed, they are too good to be true.  The whole thing from the overdone perfect standing of the believer, the eternal security linked with it (apart from responsibility of any kind), the exemption from theUnconfinedTribulation by guaranteed Rapture of every last one to the unrepealable share of each in the Kingdom of the 1000 years ( Rev. 20 ) makes them the most exalted and privileged among all God’s people.  Their vein to the reception of other believers on the ground of LIGHT not LIFE is, I think now, all wrong.  (Romans 14: 1 might have read ‘Him that is strong ... receive’ as far as most are concerned: however, G.H. Lang and other spanking-new individuals among them protested).  As my Grandmother, a Methodist, used to say of them, ‘if there is a razor edged text in the Bible, it is unchangingly for somebody else’.  Albeit, I owe so much to them and they have produced so many good teachers.  I requite thanks moreover for the many godly people I met among them.  There is no doubt the initial movement wide the rationalization of Christ, promoted Bible knowledge and spread prophetic truth far and wide.  How they have fallen, you no doubt know.   Yes William was a first matriculation scholar and worldly-wise theologian.  I know friend Cross is to bring out a biography on him some time.  I squint forward to that but think he will nonflexible put to it to largest your own effort.  By the way, I have no links to Edwin and ‘Kelly’ B’n untied from stuff a customer!  For what it is worth, I rate E.C. quite an able, moderate man.   I do not know how I can help for my powers are increasingly limited then of yore.  Perhaps it will suffice to know how highly I value your labours?   Let me wish you well for the future, which is in good hands. ( Jn 3: 35 JND’s NT) *   Yours in the LORD,     [* J. N. Darby’s Translation of John 3: 35: “The Father loves the Son, and has given all things [to be] in his hand.”]